AbstractPurpose Trapezius vestibular evoked myogenic potential (tVEMP) has been a recent test tool used to assess the vestibular pa thway. Several previous studies have proven that the trapezius muscle serves as an alternative placement for vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses from the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). Though few previous studies have been done on tVEMP using a click stimulus, the lack of research utilizing a chirp stimulus led to a strong rationale for this study. The study aims to establish normative data and determine any ear and gender-related differences in chirp-evoked tVEMP.
Methods
The study participants include 20 young adults (10 male and female) with no auditory or vestibular complaints. The research design follows a normative study design. For all the participants, tVEMP testing was conducted at 125 dB sound pressure level using a chirp stimulus.
Result Chirp-evoked tVEMP responses were robust for all the participants. The results showed no significant gender-related differences in any tVEMP parameter (p > 0.05). However, contrary to the initial statement, comparison of rectified amplitude between genders for the left ear revealed a significantly higher rectified amplitude than in the right ear. On the other hand, the mean value of the asymmetry ratio (P1-N1) was found to be greater in females than in males.
INTRODUCTIONVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are muscular responses or reflexes recorded by the surface electrodes, traditionally from the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), in response to a high-intensity sound stimulus [1]. Recent studies have expanded VEMP protocols by recording from various muscles, including trapezius, masseter, and orbicularis oculi [2]. This expansion of protocols provides an effective and comprehensive assessment of vestibular pathways, resulting in accurate diagnosis of vestibular disorders, which include Meniere’s disease, vestibular schwannoma, and multiple sclerosis [3]. Additionally, the criteria for patients undergoing VEMP testing have been broadened. Apart from vestibular testing, trapezius-placed VEMP has been investigated for evaluating corticospinal tract lesions above the C5 level [4]. Since then, the trapezius muscle serves as an alternative site for VEMP testing, especially in cases where SCM responses are difficult to obtain.
Several investigations have provided additional evidence supporting the role of the vestibular nerve in transmitting evoked responses that are observed in the SCM [5,6]. Despite using various recording sites, the response waveforms are observed to be similar, as described by Colebatch, et al. [5]. The response waveforms consist of two sequential waves, noted as P13, N23, where the lowercase letters (P, N) indicate positivity and negativity, followed by their latencies, which helps in differentiating them from conventional neurally evoked potentials [7]. The responses obtained by Robertson and Ireland [8], regarding the SCM muscle reflexes are like those of Colebatch, et al. [5], using click stimuli. However, Robertson and Ireland [8] found bilateral and symmetrical muscular responses to monoaural clicks while Colebatch, et al. [5] found greater amplitude responses for ipsilateral stimulation.
Several studies have utilized click stimuli, yielding similar results in healthy subjects. This prompted an investigation into trapezius myogenic responses using chirp stimuli. Chirp stimuli are frequency- and time-modulated, designed to counteract temporal dispersion in the normal cochlea by presenting the low-frequency energy content before the high-frequency energy. This approach aids in redefining the trapezius vestibular evoked myogenic potential (tVEMP) for chirp stimuli in healthy adults and enhances its potential for clinical application in diagnosing vestibular disorders. This study aims to demonstrate: 1) the characteristics of tVEMP using chirp stimuli in healthy young adults; 2) the potential influence of ear on these parameters; and 3) the impact of gender on the results.
MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 20 young adults (40 ears) were included in this study, with a mean age of 20.1 years for males and 20.7 years for females. A total of 10 healthy young males and females (age range from 18 to 26 years) who were free from auditory and vestibular symptoms or history.
Puretone audiometry was done to check for normal hearing level and immittance audiometry was done to check the middle ear status of the subject’s ears. Behavioral vestibular assessment was done to check balance function. All the audiometric tests were done in sound-treated rooms. Subjects were made to sit comfortably in a sound-treated room for trapezius placed VEMP recordings. Before placement of electrodes, skin was prepared with Nuprep gel, and electromyography (EMG) signals were obtained using cup electrodes placed at three different locations along the trapezius muscle for recording tVEMP responses: non-inverting - 1.5 cm away from the midline of the 6th cervical vertebrae; inverting - clavicular junction; ground - lower forehead. Chirp stimuli were presented to each ear separately with ipsilateral stimulation at a rate of 5.1/sec using alternating polarity at an intensity of 125 dB sound pressure level through Etymotic Research 3C (ER-3C; Etymotic Research, Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL, USA) inserts through air conduction mode with impedance levels that are set below 5 kΩ for individual electrodes and below 2 kΩ for interelectrode impedance. Band-pass filtered from 0.3 to 2,000 Hz, responses were amplified by a factor of 5,000 and averaged for 250 stimuli. To determine the repeatability, the averaged responses were recorded twice after the EMG signal was filtered. The interaural asymmetry ratio was calculated using the following formul:
The representative waveform of the right and left ear response is given in Figure 1. The tVEMP responses were detected for all the participants with a response rate of 100%.
Statistical analysisStatistical analysis was done using JASP version 19.2 software (JASP Team, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The Shapiro-Wilk’s test of normality showed that the data followed normal distribution for all parameters of tVEMP. Descriptive statistics were done to find out the mean, median, mode, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values for the response of tVEMP. Independent t-tests were used to compare the gender effects. Paired t-tests were done to compare ear effects.
RESULTSThe present study aims to explore and establish the normal characteristics and effects of ear and gender on trapezius- placed vestibular-evoked myogenic potential using a chirp stimulus. 20 participants (10 male and female) were included in this study and responses were obtained from all participants.
The statistical analysis findings are ordered into the subsequent sections.
Effect of gender on tVEMP parametersThe tVEMP response parameters were compared based on gender, are listed in Table 1. On analysis, the results show no significant differences between males (20.1 ± 1.72) and females (20.7 ± 1.56) P1 latency (p = 0.64), N1 latency (p = 0.18), interpeak latency (p = 0.26), rectified amplitude (p = 0.34) in the right ear. For the left ear also there is no statistical difference was found between male and female P1 latency (p = 0.21), N1 latency (p = 0.27) interpeak latency (p = 0.68). And, no significant difference was seen in peak-to-peak amplitude ratio (p = 0.89). There was a significant difference between males and females in rectified amplitude (p = 0.03*) in the left ear, but in the right ear, there was no significant difference. On group descriptive analysis the mean value of male P1 latency right ear (9.51 ± 1.10), P1 latency in left ear (9.59 ± 1.12), N1 latency in right ear (18.46 ± 1.80), N1 latency in left ear (17.82 ± 1.45), interpeak latency (right ear: 8.95 ± 1.84; left ear: 8.23 ± 1.36), rectified amplitude in right ear (1.30 ± 0.37) was higher than for females P1 latency in right ear (9.28 ± 1.10), P1 latency in left ear (9.02 ± 0.85), N1 latency in right ear (17.29 ± 1.97), N1 latency in left ear (16.78 ± 2.50), interpeak latency (right ear: 8.01 ± 1.83; left ear: 7.91 ± 2.06), rectified amplitude in right ear (1.17 ± 0.18). The mean asymmetry ratio (P1-N1) was found to be greater in females (10.40 ± 21.40) than males (9.47 ± 7.60).
Effect of ear on tVEMP parametersDescriptive statistics were done to obtain the mean and standard deviation of P1 latency, N1 latency, interpeak amplitude, and rectified amplitude of the right and left ears. To find out the level of significance (p-value), a paired t-test and Cohen’s d were done. Data were collected from a total of 40 ears and are presented in Table 2. On analysing these data, it shows that there was no statistically significant difference between right ear and left ear in P1 latency (p = 0.63) and N1 latency (p = 0.20). On comparison of interpeak latency (p = 0.43) and rectified amplitude (p = 0.61) between right and left ear also shows no statistical difference.
Normal values of tVEMP using chirp stimulusDescriptive statistical analysis was conducted on data from all 40 ears of the participants instead of analysing the right and left ears separately. However, the amplitude asymmetry ratio was analysed from data collected from all 20 participants. The mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values of P1 latency, N1 latency, interpeak latency, and rectified amplitude for both ears’ response parameters of tVEMP using a chirp stimulus in healthy young adults were listed in Table 3. The mean values of P1 latency, N1 latency, and interpeak latency were numerically higher, with increased amplitudes observed in the right ear compared to the left ear; however, these differences were not statistically significant.
DISCUSSIONSEffect of gender on tVEMP parametersThe study results reveal no significant difference between males and females, but the rectified amplitude of the left ear shows a significant difference, with males exhibiting higher values than females. These findings align with a previous study comparing evoked potentials recorded from different muscles. Ferber-Viart, et al. [9] compared the VEMP findings obtained from the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles, which showed that latencies were shorter and amplitudes were lower in the sternocleidomastoid than trapezius muscle. This indicates that the selection of the muscle for recordings can also have an influence. Regarding gender difference, similar to that of this study’s findings, no significant differences were found in latency or amplitude in a study done by Oliveira, et al. [10]. Later in 2005, Ge, et al. [11] conducted a study to investigate the gender differences in pain modulation evoked by repeated injections of glutamate into the trapezius muscle and found that males and females exhibit different pain responses, which suggests that gender may influence muscle characteristics. On consideration of additional factors, including muscle mass, tone, and hormonal influences is necessary to understand the impact of gender on VEMP responses in detail [12].
Effect of ear on tVEMP parametersThe findings of this study show no significant differences between right and left ears in P1 latency, N1 latency, interpeak latency, and rectified amplitude, which consistently correlate with previous studies done on VEMP. A study by Ferber-Viart, et al. [9] found that latencies and amplitude of VEMP recorded from sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles were symmetrical in normal subjects, with no significant differences between ears. Similarly, a study by de Oliveira, et al. [13] reported no significant interaural difference in VEMP parameters in healthy individuals. The absence of ear-related differences in this study may be attributed to the use of chirp stimuli, which are due to compensate for the frequency-dependent delays in the cochlea, leading to more synchronous activation of the auditory pathway. This synchronization could minimize potential interaural differences in neural processing times [14].
Normal values of tVEMP using chirp stimulusThe analysis revealed that the mean P1 latency, N1 latency, and interpeak latency were longer, and the rectified amplitude was higher in the right ear compared to the left ear. These findings suggest subtle interaural differences in tVEMP parameters, which may be influenced by various factors. For instance, a study by Özgür, et al. [15] found that chirp stimuli resulted in shorter latencies and larger amplitudes compared to tone bursts in the SCM recorded VEMP. Also, they reported no significant interaural asymmetry ratios, suggesting that chirp stimuli may reduce ear-related differences in VEMP parameters. These differences may be influenced by several factors, which may include individual variations in muscle tone and contraction strength [15]. These factors can affect the amplitude of VEMP response, as the vestibular-cervical reflex stabilizes the head during unexpected translation [12]. Monitoring the contraction state of the SCM is crucial for accurately interpreting VEMP tests, as variation in muscle tone and mass can lead to significant interpersonal differences in response [12]. Additionally, anatomical differences between right and left vestibular pathways, like variations in length and myelination of neural fibres, could also contribute to these findings. Despite its potential, it remains robust and reliable; it lacks information and investigation on origin of its potential in the vestibular apparatus, normative in larger populations with different age groups, and to implement this test, frequency tuning has to be done on larger population. Even though this study gives the normative data for chirp stimuli tVEMP, the sample size is small and this could be a drawback of this study. Much more research is needed with a large sample size to establish definitive normative data.
This study helps in establishing the normative data for trapezius placed tVEMP using a chirp stimulus in young adults. The findings highlight the feasibility and reliability of this muscle for vestibular evoked responses. No significant gender ear-related differences were observed across most parameters, with the exception of higher rectified amplitude in the left ear between males and females. These results were consistent with previous research, indicating factors such as selection of muscle response for recording, individual physiological variations, and type of stimulus used for evoked responses.
NotesEthical Statement All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation. Data were collected anonymously and handled confidentially in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Acknowledgement The authors thank the Institute and the Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Jeev’s Advanced Hearing and Multidisciplinary Therapy Clinic, Sentara ENT, Hearing Aids & Multi Rehab clinic, ANVICARE Speech and Hearing Centre, family, friends, and my beloved brother, Thangachi Maa, for their support. Declaration of Conflicting Interests There is no potential conflict of interest disclosed by the authors. Funding The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRMIST, Kattankulathur for bearing the defrayed costs of publishing this article. Author Contributions Conceptualization: Jeyajeevan Dharmarajan Mathialakan, Adlin Dino Ramsankar. Data curation: Jeyajeevan Dharmarajan Mathialakan, Adlin Dino Ramsankar. Investigation: A Vigneshkumar, Jeyajeevan Dharmarajan Mathialakan. Validation: M Mani Prashanth, Sivashanmugam Krishnamurthy. Writing-original draft: Jeyajeevan Dharmarajan Mathialakan, A Vigneshkumar. Writing-review & editing: Jeyajeevan Dharmarajan Mathialakan, Adlin Dino Ramsankar, Vimalraj Manibalan. Approval of final manuscript: all authors. Table 1.Comparison of tVEMP response parameters in both genders
Table 2.Comparison of t-VEMP response parameters using a chirp stimulus in the right and left ears Table 3.Normal characteristics and normative values for trapezius placed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (tVEMP) using a chirp stimulus in healthy young adults REFERENCES1. Ferber-Viart C, Soulier N, Dubreuil C, Duclaux R. Cochleovestibular afferent pathways of trapezius muscle responses to clicks in human. Acta Otolaryngol. 1998;118(1):6-10.
2. Lullo F, Provitera V, Zamprotta L, Prisco C, Lanzillo B, Manganelli F, et al. Myogenic vestibular-evoked potentials: an extension of the assessment protocol. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(12):e437.
3. Zhou G, Cox LC. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: history and overview. Am J Audiol. 2004;13(2):135-43.
4. Chan YC, Yeh IB, Kannan TA, Wilder-Smith E. Trapezius motor evoked potential in evaluations of corticospinal tract lesions. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(4):540-3.
5. Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF. Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(2):190-7.
6. Halmagyi GM, Colebatch JG. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in the sternomastoid muscle are not of lateral canal origin. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1995;520 Pt 1:1-3.
7. Yoshie N, Okudaira T. Myogenic evoked potential responses to clicks in man. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1969;252:89-103.
9. Ferber-Viart C, Duclaux R, Colleaux B, Dubreuil C. Myogenic vestibular-evoked potentials in normal subjects: a comparison between responses obtained from sternomastoid and trapezius muscles. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117(4):472-81.
10. Oliveira AC, Colafêmina JF, Menezes Pde L. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials using low frequency stimuli. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(6):706-10.
11. Ge HY, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Gender differences in pain modulation evoked by repeated injections of glutamate into the human trapezius muscle. Pain. 2005;113(1-2):134-40.
12. Carnaúba AT, Farias VV, Santos N, Oliveira AC, Rodrigues RG, Menezes Pde L. Influence of gender on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(2):245-8.
13. de Oliveira AC, David R, Colafêmina JF. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: recording methods in humans and guinea pigs. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(5):770-5.
|
|